20 HP / 14 lb-ft torque gain from 91 Octane gas on Tacoma Gas Engine 2.4 i-Force (dyno tested by Stillen)

[tacorancher]

Filling with 93 now. Wonder if gains will be diminishing between 91 and 93.

Sponsored

 

[tacorancher]

So far the engine is driving like thick, creamy butter. Decadent.

 

[Drifte]

Filling with 93 now. Wonder if gains will be diminishing between 91 and 93.

It should improve, but likely unnoticeable. Ethanol content cant play a role here, around me going from 91 to 93 means going from no ethanol to about 10%. And thats fine and great from a performance stand point, but if fuel economy is also the goal, it will likely gain nothing at all, in-fact it may go the opposite. I havent gotten a deep dive into toyotas tuning software, but if its even similar to my bmw the computer can compensate much more than in the past to adapt to fuel and air changes. Id be curious to see if an e30 mix is attainable with the factory fueling system. I know the cap says the ethanol limit, which I believe still allows for the 88octane e15 mix thats so common around me. JB4 will likely have the data on all of this very soon!

 

[tacorancher]

It should improve, but likely unnoticeable. Ethanol content cant play a role here, around me going from 91 to 93 means going from no ethanol to about 10%. And thats fine and great from a performance stand point, but if fuel economy is also the goal, it will likely gain nothing at all, in-fact it may go the opposite. I have gotten a deep dive into toyotas tuning software, but if its even similar to my bmw the computer can compensate much more than in the past to adapt to fuel and air changes. Id be curious to see if an e30 mix is attainable with the factory fueling system. I know the cap says the ethanol limit, which I believe still allows for the 88octane e15 mix thats so common around me. JB4 will likely have the data on all of this very soon!

At Buccees Down here in Texas we have 92 octane zero ethanol option. Should I choose that next

 

[Drifte]

At Buccees Down here in Texas we have 92 octane zero ethanol option. Should I choose that next

It certainly wouldnt hurt, but if the cost is significantly more I wouldnt bother. I will be curious to see timing adjustments with fueling on these vehicles. May get lucky and HPTuners supports these trucks and I can log some solid data.

 

[bking]

At Buccees Down here in Texas we have 92 octane zero ethanol option. Should I choose that next

It would be worth a try unless it's ridiculously expensive. My son was an engineer at Ford and one of the dirty secrets is that the MPG ratings from the manufacturers are made from pure gas, no ethanol, and that ethanol does reduce your MPG. We don't have 91 pure gas in Ohio except at a few places and it's ridiculously expensive. Sad part is that ethanol doesn't do much good for supply. It does boost octane while ripping up our engines at the same time. I swear that if the Iowa Caucuses weren't first, we wouldn't have to deal with it.

 

[32spoke]

It would be worth a try unless it's ridiculously expensive. My son was an engineer at Ford and one of the dirty secrets is that the MPG ratings from the manufacturers are made from pure gas, no ethanol, and that ethanol does reduce your MPG. We don't have 91 pure gas in Ohio except at a few places and it's ridiculously expensive. Sad part is that ethanol doesn't do much good for supply. It does boost octane while ripping up our engines at the same time. I swear that if the Iowa Caucuses weren't first, we wouldn't have to deal with it.

Agreed! Here in California with our blended fuel, we have to burn more fuel to get to a destination. I guess there is “special math” that justifies burning “more fuel that is cleaner” but I have yet to wrap my head around it.

 

[Drifte]

Agreed! Here in California with our blended fuel, we have to burn more fuel to get to a destination. I guess there is “special math” that justifies burning “more fuel that is cleaner” but I have yet to wrap my head around it.

Ideally its a balance of alcohol added, increases octane and reduced combustion temperatures. 10% and under shouldn't be noticeable fuel economy changes, but above that drops off. E85 being a 30% increase in fuel demands. Its great for performance applications, and has a nice smell to it. But if Im road tripping and want maximum range, I avoid ethanol in the fuel. Its a subsidized fuel, much like solar farms and wind turbines.

 

[TacoFreak]

How about aviation fuel? You can get it up to 100 octane.

 

[32spoke]

Ideally its a balance of alcohol added, increases octane and reduced combustion temperatures. 10% and under shouldn't be noticeable fuel economy changes, but above that drops off. E85 being a 30% increase in fuel demands. Its great for performance applications, and has a nice smell to it. But if Im road tripping and want maximum range, I avoid ethanol in the fuel. Its a subsidized fuel, much like solar farms and wind turbines.

Yes, less than 1 mpg loss… my biggest concern is the hygroscopic issue with ethanol.

Sponsored