- Joined
- Jul 25, 2020
- Threads
- 168
- Messages
- 481
- Reaction score
- 724
- Location
- Tacoma4G.com
- Website
- www.tacoma4g.com
- Vehicle(s)
- Toyota
- Thread starter
- #1
Sponsored
Sponsored
MPG Comparison: Camper vs. No Camper -- Denver 100 Test by TFL
- Thread starter Administrator
- Start date
- Watchers 2
R.A.N.M.J.
Well-known member
Yeah, that's a lot of drag added on the highway. You can literally hear the MPG's dropping. Sometimes I wonder what TFL thinks is going to happen when they do videos like this.
It's plainly obvious that if you add a flat vertical surface to the top of any vehicle the MPG's are going to go down. In other news, the sky is blue, the sun is bright and the ocean is filled with water.
It's plainly obvious that if you add a flat vertical surface to the top of any vehicle the MPG's are going to go down. In other news, the sky is blue, the sun is bright and the ocean is filled with water.
R.A.N.M.J.
Well-known member
Yeah, I guess I was just eye-rolling the feigned surprise at the end of the video that they lost "only" 13% fuel economy. That's not an insignificant amount.
TalkingTaco444
Well-known member
Of course its obvious. Thats not the point of these tests.
The point is to determine how much it drops and how that compares to other vehicles.
R.A.N.M.J.
Well-known member
Is the iForceMax not coming in the 6' bed? I didn't know that.
BourbonRunner
Active member
- First Name
- Steve
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2024
- Threads
- 0
- Messages
- 32
- Reaction score
- 41
- Location
- Baltimore Area
- Vehicle(s)
- Bronco Sport, German Money Pit, Rusty Toyota
I beg to differ. The point of the video, its length, content, and dragging out of the most crucial bit of info there is only to increase the monetizing of the video on YouTube.
Otherwise 30 seconds could have covered this.
Sponsored
